The relationship between the artistic, execution and difficulty scores and the final score of the athletes competing in the 13th European Aerobic Gymnastics Championship


Abstract views: 134 / PDF downloads: 74

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12599837

Keywords:

Aerobic gymnastics, artistic score, difficulty score, execution score

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the scores from the artistic, execution and difficulty components of the exercise to find a place in the ranking of athletes who participated in different categories in the 15-17 age group at the 13th European Aerobic Gymnastics Championships. The research was conducted as a descriptive study with data in a publicly available, raw format. The results that determined the ranking of the athletes were taken from the official results book of the competition. Before selecting the tests to be applied to the data obtained from the study, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test was applied, and it was found that the data did not have a normal distribution. For this reason, the Mann Whitney U test was used to determine the score differences in the men’s singles and women’s singles categories, and the Kruskal Wallis H test was used to determine the score differences in the mixed pairs, trio and group categories. The Spearman correlation test was used to determine the relationship between the artistic, execution and difficulty scores and the final score. Statistically significant differences by category were found when comparing artistic, execution, difficulty and result scores (p <0.05). In addition, a very high positive and significant correlation was found between the artistic, execution and difficulty ratings and the final grade (p<0.01). It can be inferred that it is important to take the necessary training measures to improve performance, which requires a combination of highly technical and complex skills to maximize the difficulty, execution and artistic scores, which are directly related to the final score.

References

Agopyan, A., & Örs, B. S., (2019). An analysis of variations in body movement difficulty of 2016 Olympic Games rhythmic gymnast candidates. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 19(3), 417-434.

Akyüz, Ö., Turna, B., Çiçek, G., Yıldırım, S., Bayazıt, B., & Akyüz, M. (2022). Elit futbolcuların maç öncesi dehidrasyon düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı 1), 474-482.

Altun, M. & Özsoy, M. (2023). Relationship of knee and hip joint proprioception with competition success in aerobic gymnastics. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi. 8, 186-195.

Alves, C. R., Borelli, M. T., Paineli, V.deS., Azevedo, R.deA., Borelli, C. C., Lancha Junior, A. H., … et al. (2015). Development of a specific anaerobic field test for aerobic gymnastics. Plos One, 10(4), e0123115.

Atikovic, A & Kamenjašević, E. (2021). The prediction of all-around event final score based on d and e score factors in women’s artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 13, 47-58.

Bağcı, E., Çelen, A., Okan, İ., Bilgin, Ü., Gökyürek, B., & Arslan, Y., (2023). Investigation of relative age effect on gymnasts competing in group categories. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, 12(3), 478-483.

Chayun, D. V. (2024). Qualimetry of psychophysiological parameters in aerobic gymnastics. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 17(2), 361–373.

Cordun, M., Bratu, M., Mınculescu, C. A., Stoıan, O., Ghezea, A., & Chıță, R. V. (2021). The intervention of competitive aerobic gymnastics on body posture. Discobolul-Physical Education, Sport & Kinetotherapy Journal, 60(4).

Cuk, I., Fink, H., & Leskosek, B. (2012). Modeling the final score in artistic gymnastics by different weights of difficulty and execution. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 4(1), 73.

FIG-Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique. (2024a). 2022-2024 Code of points aerobic gymnastics. https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/rules/#4

FIG-Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique. (2024b). Results https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/events/searchresults.php#filter

Höög, S., & Andersson, E. P. (2021). Sex and age-group differences in strength, jump, speed, flexibility, and endurance performances of swedish elite gymnasts competing in team gym. Front Sports Act Living, 3, 653503.

Koca Kosova, M. & Kosova, S. (2021a). Evaluation of scores of the 33rd and 34th Junior European Championships in Men’s Artistic Gymnastics. European Journal of Human Movement, 46, 50-58.

Kosova, S. & Koca Kosova, M. (2021b). The effect of score types on total score in trampoline gymnastics: Example of the European Championship in Sochi 2021. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 25, 349-354.

Lamošová A., Lukina S.M., Kyselovičová O., Krnáčová A., & Selecká L. (2020). 3D analysis of two different difficulty elements (illusions) in aerobic gymnastics. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, (8), 23-26.

Lela, N., Rahmawati, D., Widyastuti, M., Kirana, S., Chabibah, N., Gumilan, C. … et al. (2023). The Correlational Analysis of Aerobic Gymnastics and The Students’ Physical Fitness, and Their Learning Motivation at STIKES Hang Tuah Surabaya. Journal of Bionursing, 5, 230-244.

León-Prados, J. & Jemni, M. (2021). Reliability and agreement in technical and artistic scores during real-time judging in two European acrobatic gymnastic events. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 22, 1-17.

Lijuan, G (2013). A study on the change tendency of difficulty elements in aerobic gymnastics competitions under the new rules. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 5(12), 750-756

Mehrtash, M., Rohani, H., Farzaneh, E., & Nasiri, R. (2015). The effects of 6 months specific aerobic gymnastic training on motor abilities in 10–12 years old boys. Science of gymnastics Journal, 7(1), 51-60.

Mezei, M. & Orlando, C. (2014). Performance criteria in aerobic gymnastics – Impact on the sportive training. procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 117, 367-373.

Mezei, M., Wesselly, T., Pelin, R. A., & Grigoroiu, C. (2019). Optimizations of selection in aerobic gymnastics by correlating physical and technical elements. Supplementary Issue of Discobolul–Physical Education, Sport & Kinetotherapy Journal, 126-134.

Mezei, M., Florescu, O., Leonte, N., Popescu, O. & Chiriac P. S. (2021). Ratio of the difficulty criterion in the competitive final score in aerobic gymnastics. Discobolul–Physical Education, Sport & Kinetotherapy Journal, 60(2), 182-196.

Örs, B. (2020). The effect of difficulty and execution scores on total ranking during 2019 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships. African Educational Research Journal, 8. 37-42.

Pajek, M. B., Cuk, I., Pajek, J., Kovač, M., & Leskošek, B. (2013). Is the quality of judging in women artistic gymnastics equivalent at major competitions of different levels? Journal of Human Kinetics, 37, 173–181.

Popescu, G., Dına, L., & Stroescu, S. (2021). Transformations and contradictions in elite aerobic gymnastics. Discobolul-Physical Education, Sport & Kinetotherapy Journal, 60.

Puıu, M., & Dragomır, A. (2021). Neuromuscular and Physiological Assessment During a Vertical Jumping Test in Aerobic Gymnastics. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 11(4Sup1), 156-166.

Raiola, G., Giugno, Y., Scassillo, I. & Di tore, P. (2013). An experimental study on aerobic gymnastic: Performance analysis as an effective evaluation for technique and teaching of motor gestures. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 8. 297-306.

Ratna, B., Endang, R. S., Lukas, M. B., Veramyta, M. M. F. B., Fransisca, J., Ranintya, M. … et al. (2023). Operational test model of aerobic gymnastic flexibility test for national development category. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 11(3), 627- 633.

Sak, R., Şahin Sak, İ. T., Öneren Şendil, Ç. & Nas, E. (2021). Bir araştırma yöntemi olarak doküman analizi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 227-256.

Sayyah, Q. M. (2022). Biomechanical analysis of (illusions) skill as a guide to specific exercises in aerobic gymnastics. Racin Journal in the Studies Sports Activities and Movement Sciences, 3(2).

Tatlıbal, P., Kutlay, E., & Oral, O. (2022). The effect of score components on total score in the individual apparatus qualification of 1st rhythmic gymnastics junior world championships. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 14(1), 97–105.

Yıldırım, S., Akyüz, M., Turna, B., Bayazıt, B., Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ç., Bayar, C., ... et al. (2022). Elit Futbolcularda İleri, Medial Yan ve Çapraz Tek Bacak Sıçrama Testleri: Farklı Lig Seviyelerindei. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science (MJSS), 5.

Ylenia, G., Salvatore, N., Riccardo, I. & Gaetano, R. (2013). Assessment of aerobic gymnastics by video analysis. Science, Movement and Health, 13(2), 205-210.

Zala, B., Nagykáldi, C., Toth, L. & Kalmár, Z. (2023). Comparative analysis of aerobic gymnastics and gymnastics competitors based on a test of performance strategy (TOPS). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23. 1191-1197.

Zhang, L. (2022). Evaluation of difficulty in women’s aerobic gymnastics competitions. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 29, e2022_0282.

Published

06/30/2024

How to Cite

Keskin, Özlem. (2024). The relationship between the artistic, execution and difficulty scores and the final score of the athletes competing in the 13th European Aerobic Gymnastics Championship. Journal of ROL Sport Sciences, 5(2), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12599837